Logo

Significant Decision Made in the Armed Career Criminal Act

Significant Decision Made in the Armed Career Criminal Act

Borden is a United States Supreme Court case involving the classification of prior convictions for “violent felony” in the application of Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); the ACCA provides for enhanced sentencing for convicted criminals with three or more such felonies in their history. In a 5–4 decision in June 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that crimes resulting from reckless conduct should not be considered as a “violent felony” for the purposes of the ACCA.

The High Court’s decision made plain a criminal offense with a mens rea of recklessness does not qualify as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act’s elements clause. The decision is certainly good news. Borden follows a string of favorable decision effecting in sentence reduction, something we fully support, handed down in the past several years like Johnson v. United States, ___U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 2551, 2563, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015).

TheSupreme Court’s decisions in Johnson invalidated the ACCA ‘s residual and Welch v. United States, 578 U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 1257 (2016) made Johnson retroactive. In Welch, the Supreme Court held that Johnson announced a new substantive rule that applies retroactively to ACCA § 924(e) residual clause cases on collateral review. Welch, 578 U.S. at ––––, 136 S. Ct. at 1264–65.

Both Johnson and Welch add import to Borden. They establish that anyone who was sentenced to an enhanced sentence, and one of the predicate previous crimes of violence were crimes resulting from reckless conduct, put your 28 USC §2255 paperwork in and give that time back.

Contact an Experienced Philadelphia Criminal Defense Attorney About Your Charges in Pennsylvania


Have you been charged with a crime in Pennsylvania? A conviction can carry with it heavy fines, jail time, and driver’s license suspension! That is why it is imperative that you speak with a qualified criminal defense lawyer about your case. The lawyers at Marrone Law Firm, LLC represent clients in Philadelphia, Center City, University City, and throughout Pennsylvania. Call (866) 732-6700 or fill out our confidential online form to schedule a free consultation about your case. We have an office located at 200 S. Broad St., Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19102.

The articles on this blog are for informative purposes only and are no substitute for legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact our law firm directly.

NJ Has Dismissed 88K Marijuana Cases Under New Law

NJ Has Dismissed 88K Marijuana Cases Under New Law

New Jersey courts have announced that they have dismissed or vacated the first of over 88,000 marijuana-related cases as part of the state’s new marijuana legalization laws passed earlier this year.

State Working to Vacate/Dismiss Marijuana Convictions

As of mid-July 2021, the state judiciary had managed to dismiss or vacate marijuana possession convictions in about 88,000 cases, representing the first wave of an estimated 360,000 total cases that are eligible for dismissal or vacatur. 

Once a case is dismissed or vacated, the records of the arrest or conviction will still need to be expunged. The state judiciary has announced that marijuana arrests and convictions that are dismissed or vacated will eventually be automatically expunged, as well. The judiciary is also setting up an electronic system that will allow individuals who have had their marijuana convictions dismissed and their records expunged to obtain a certificate confirming that their records have been expunged. 

Clearing of Records Part of Marijuana Legalization Laws

This process of automatically dismissing and expunging marijuana convictions is part of the marijuana decriminalization and legalization laws passed following the voter referendum that called for the legalization of cannabis in New Jersey. The package of laws also sets up a framework for legal marijuana sales to individuals age 21 and older, as well as ending arrests for possession of marijuana.

As part of the laws, the legislature has also called for eliminating criminal records of certain marijuana-related convictions, including selling less than one ounce of marijuana, possession of marijuana for personal use, possession of marijuana in a vehicle, and possession of drug paraphernalia. The judiciary’s orders for vacating, dismissing, and expunging marijuana arrest and conviction records applies to both old cases as well as individuals currently serving sentences of incarceration, probation, or parole, and those with pending marijuana-related criminal charges. 

Why Expungement of Marijuana Records Is Important

In the past, New Jersey has had a difficult and complex criminal record expungement process for offenders. People had to petition the courts to establish their eligibility for expungement under state law. In recent years, New Jersey has been reforming the expungement system in the state, including expanding eligibility, eliminating filing fees, and beginning to move parts of the process online. The goal is ultimately to fully automate the expungement system so that offenders will have little or no work on their part to obtain an expungement if they are eligible to receive one.

Expunging the records of those persons who were arrested and convicted of marijuana-related offenses is an important goal for social justice advocates. Having a criminal record makes it difficult for people to secure employment, housing, or educational opportunities, even when records are years or even decades old. In addition, because marijuana laws are seen as having been disproportionately enforced against African American and Black communities, having a process by which convictions and arrests are automatically dismissed and the expungement of the records will alleviate the social burdens that these communities experience due to the stigma of criminal records.

Contact an Experienced Philadelphia Drug Defense Attorney About Your Marijuana Drug Crime Charges in Pennsylvania

Have you been charged with a drug-related offense in Pennsylvania?  A drug crime conviction can carry with it heavy fines, jail time, and driver’s license suspension! That is why it is imperative that you speak with a qualified criminal defense lawyer about your case. The lawyers at Marrone Law Firm, LLC represent clients charged with use, possession, production, distribution, and related drug offenses in Philadelphia, Center City, University City, and throughout Pennsylvania. Call (866) 732-6700 or fill out our confidential online form to schedule a free consultation about your case. We have an office located at 200 S. Broad St., Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19102.

The articles on this blog are for informative purposes only and are no substitute for legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact our law firm directly.

Shooting at Sunnyvale Party in Airbnb Rental House Leaves One Dead

Shooting at Sunnyvale Party in Airbnb Rental House Leaves One Dead

An 18-year-old was shot and killed at an unauthorized house party being held in an Airbnb rental in Sunnyvale, California. 

Deadly Shooting Occurs at House Party Held in California Airbnb

Over 100 teenagers showed up for a party at a single-story home in a quiet neighborhood in Sunnyvale, where Elias Elhania was shot and killed.

In the wake of the shooting, investigations revealed that the home was not registered with the city of Sunnyvale as a short-term rental property and the owner of the property was not present on the premises during the party. Moreover, the nearly 150 people who attended the party far exceeded the four-person maximum limit allowed in short-term rentals under Sunnyvale ordinances.

Incident Reveals Problems with Short-Term Rental Properties

As with many municipalities, Sunnyvale requires property owners who list their properties for short-term rental on sites like Airbnb to register with the city’s planning department and pay a yearly fee. The city also limits properties to no more than four guests, and also requires the property owner to remain on-site during rentals. However, the city does not proactively enforce its short-term rental ordinances or cross-check the properties registered with the city against the properties that are listed on Airbnb and other short-term rental sites. Airbnb does not share its listings of rentals with cities.

Following another deadly shooting at a house party at an Airbnb in Orinda, California, the local authorities cross-checked Airbnb listings in the municipality against registered properties and found nearly 40 homes that were in violation of local ordinances governing short-term rentals. Orinda requested that Airbnb remove those properties from its listings, a request the company complied with.

After the Orinda shooting, Airbnb announced a variety of policy changes on its platform, including prohibiting the use of Airbnb rentals to throw house parties, expanding manual screening efforts to identify reservations suspected of being for the purposes of throwing parties and having a hotline that neighbors of Airbnb properties can call to report parties or large gatherings being thrown at Airbnb houses. Airbnb also instituted a rule prohibiting users under the age of 25 with fewer than three positive reviews from booking entire properties in the user’s home area. 

Who Can Be Held Liable for Injuries Suffered at House Parties Held in Airbnbs?

Despite these efforts to curb the use of Airbnbs for house parties or other large gatherings, more than 100 shootings have occurred in short-term rentals in the U.S. and Canada over the past two years. When someone is injured in an assault that occurs during an unsanctioned party or event at an Airbnb, who can be held liable? In the Sunnyvale shooting, Airbnb has announced that it intends to take legal action against the user who reserved the property on the Airbnb platform. 

In addition to the guest who reserved the property, the property’s owner may also bear liability for injuries, especially in locations like Sunnyvale where local ordinances require the owner to remain on the premises during a short-term rental.

Pursuing liability against Airbnb may prove difficult unless the company had notice that a property was not properly registered with the local municipality or the municipal government had asked Airbnb to delist the property. 

Contact a Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer to Discuss Your Airbnb Accident Case in Pennsylvania

Did you or a loved one sustain serious injuries due to an Airbnb accident in Pennsylvania? Don’t let the medical bills pile up while you wait for the negligent party or their insurance company to do the right thing. Right now, you need an aggressive personal injury attorney on your side, fighting to get you the compensation you need, want, and deserve. The skilled attorneys at Marrone Law Firm, LLC represent clients injured because of Airbnb accidents in Philadelphia, Center City, University City, and throughout Pennsylvania. Call (866) 732-6700 or fill out our online contact form to schedule a free consultation about your case. We have an office conveniently located at 200 S. Broad St., Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19102.

The articles on this blog are for informative purposes only and are no substitute for legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact our law firm directly.

More Building Collapses Likely Due to Effects of Climate Change

More Building Collapses Likely Due to Effects of Climate Change

The collapse of the Champlain Towers South condominium building in Surfside, Florida in late June 2021 has placed a spotlight on the safety of various buildings reaching 40 years of age or older. In cities and towns along the coastline, the increasing severity of the effects of climate change has also caused worry that many older buildings and towers will rapidly become unsafe

Why Do Building Collapses Occur?

Building collapses occur due to a wide variety of causes, including structural defects baked into the building during its construction, inadequate maintenance, and environmental factors. In many cases of building collapse, it is often a combination of factors that leads to the accident.

How Climate Change Can Cause or Contribute to Building Collapses

In the Surfside collapse, some experts believe that environmental conditions may have been the ultimately triggering cause of the tragedy. Although the building may have had substandard work performed during its original construction, flooding, hurricanes, and other violent weather, and land sinkage may have accelerated the deterioration of the building’s structure, including the reinforced concrete making up the building’s support walls and pillars. 

Unfortunately, due to the effects of climate change, buildings will be more frequently exposed to harsh environmental conditions than the developers of those buildings could have ever imagined. This includes:

  • More frequent flooding, increased flood, or flooding in areas previously not prone to flooding.
  • More violent weather, including increased frequency and severity of tropical storms and tornadoes.
  • More extreme temperatures, particularly longer, hotter summers.

Liability for Building Collapse Accidents

When a building collapse accident does occur, it often leads to death, severe injury, and significant property damage and loss. However, determining who can be held liable for all this loss is not always easy. Liability for building collapses may fall upon parties such as:

  • The building’s owner or manager. In the Surfside collapse, the condominium association responsible for managing the building has been sued under the theory that it was negligent in its duties to maintain the structural integrity of the condo building. Building owner/manager negligence may lead to a building collapse where the owner/manager fails to undertake reasonable inspections or negligently hires an inadequate or unsafe contractor to perform work on the building.
  • Contractors, including those who originally constructed the building as well as later contractor firms who perform maintenance or build additions onto the structure. Contractors may be held liable for shoddy work or knowingly using substandard materials.
  • Architects who designed the building, if they put in a defective design feature that ultimately leads to a collapse.
  • Engineers who review and approve the construction plans, or who are called in over the years to inspect and certify the safety of the building.

At the Marrone Law Firm, we have unique experience in building collapse cases. Our firm successfully represented victims of the Salvation Army store collapse in Philadelphia in 2013. The collapse was ultimately attributed to negligence by contractors who were demolishing a nearby building. The victims of the accident, including the family of a 59-year-old man whose pre-existing heart condition was made fatal due to the accident represented by The Marrone Law Firm, ultimately recovered more than $227 million in settlement compensation.

Contact a Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer to Discuss Your Building Collapse Accident Case in Pennsylvania

Did you or a loved one sustain serious injuries due to a building collapse accident in Pennsylvania? Don’t let the medical bills pile up while you wait for the negligent party or their insurance company to do the right thing. Right now, you need an aggressive personal injury attorney on your side, fighting to get you the compensation you need, want, and deserve. The skilled attorneys at Marrone Law Firm, LLC represent clients injured because of building collapse accidents in Philadelphia, Center City, University City, and throughout Pennsylvania. Call (866) 732-6700 or fill out our online contact form to schedule a free consultation about your case. We have an office conveniently located at 200 S. Broad St., Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19102.

The articles on this blog are for informative purposes only and are no substitute for legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact our law firm directly.

PA Supreme Court Overturns Bill Cosby Sexual Assault Conviction

PA Supreme Court Overturns Bill Cosby Sexual Assault Conviction

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently overturned a sexual assault conviction against Bill Cosby, concluding that the prosecutor’s office, which ran the case, had improperly reneged on a prior agreement not to prosecute Cosby for the sexual assault charges that he was ultimately convicted for. The supreme court’s ruling did not comment on the jury verdict but instead based the decision on a violation of Cosby’s due process rights.

Cosby’s First Trial Resulted in a Hung Jury

Cosby underwent two trials on his charges. Attorney Joseph Marrone of the Marrone Law Firm, LLC explained in an interview with WTXF FOX 29 that Cosby was able to be tried twice because his first trial ended in a hung jury that could not reach a unanimous decision, resulting in the trial judge declaring a mistrial that effectively rendered that first trial “void” because no decision was reached.

Retrial Includes Other Accusers Testifying Against Cosby

Although Cosby’s first trial only included testimony from one woman accusing Cosby of sexual assault, his retrial included testimony from five women. Attorney Joseph Marrone explained that although Cosby was not on trial for the assault alleged by those other women, their testimony could be admitted to show a consistent pattern of how Cosby committed abuse. Attorney Marrone also noted that Cosby’s retrial was taking place following the #metoo movement, which could potentially sway jurors, as well as Cosby’s sentencing if he were convicted.

First Week of Retrial

The first week of Cosby’s retrial included testimony from multiple women who accused Cosby of drugging and sexually assaulting them, including the victim for whom Cosby was facing trial. Attorney Joseph Marrone noted that each of the alleged victims had common threads in their description of how Cosby assaulted each of them, believing that it would help connect and corroborate the allegations of the victim for whom Cosby was on trial.

Second Week of Retrial

The second week of trial included testimony from the primary victim and from her mother. The jury also heard testimony from a deposition Cosby had given several years ago in which he described his conduct with women. Attorney Joseph Marrone in a Fox29 interview also noted that the defense team for Cosby was attempting to interject reasonable doubt into the minds of the jury by establishing a narrative that the victim had fabricated her allegations in an attempt to extort money from Cosby.

Cosby Convicted Following Retrial

Ultimately, Cosby was convicted on his sexual assault charges following the retrial. In an interview with CBC Toronto, Attorney Joseph Marrone noted that bringing in the additional alleged victims’ testimony had an impact on the outcome of the case. Attorney Marrone also cited the unsealing of Cosby’s deposition testimony as encouraging the other victims to come forward and testify consistent with Cosby’s own description of his encounters with women. Attorney Marrone also noted the effect that the #metoo movement and the effort to hold celebrities accountable for sexual assault had an impact on the jury.

Cosby Appeals His Conviction

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed to hear Cosby’s appeal of his sexual assault conviction. Attorney Joseph Marrone noted that the supreme court case would focus on the increased number of alleged victims testifying in the second trial as well as the purported deal between Cosby’s attorney and the prosecutor’s office that Cosby would not be charged with sexual assault. 

PA Supreme Court Overturns Cosby’s Conviction

The supreme court ultimately ruled that the prosecutor’s office was bound by its agreement with Cosby’s legal team not to charge him with sexual assault. Attorney Joseph Marrone told Fox29 that the prior district attorney had agreed not to charge Cosby in exchange for him agreeing to testify in a deposition in the civil lawsuit brought by the victim. However, in Cosby’s retrial, his deposition testimony was used against him to bolster the state’s case.

Contact an Experienced Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer About Your Charges

Were you arrested or charged in Pennsylvania? The consequences of a conviction could be severe, leaving you with a permanent criminal record and possibly even sending you to jail. That is why you need to speak with a qualified criminal defense attorney as soon as possible about your case. The attorneys at Marrone Law Firm, LLC have successfully represented clients charged in Philadelphia, Center City, University City, and throughout Pennsylvania. Call (866) 732-6700 or fill out the online contact form to schedule a consultation with a member of our legal team. We have an office conveniently located at 200 South Broad Street, Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19102.

The articles on this blog are for informative purposes only and are no substitute for legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact our law firm directly.

Wrongful Conviction, Forced Confessions, Police Misconduct and Evidence Tampering

Wrongful Conviction, Forced Confessions, Police Misconduct and Evidence Tampering

While wrongful convictions and police misconduct are anything but new, there is now a heightened level of awareness of these injustices among the general public. Securing release from prison is the top priority of anyone wrongfully convicted person, but it is also important to remember that there could be a remedy in civil court.

For many people wrongfully convicted of a crime, the best opportunity to hold the government accountable is through a civil lawsuit. This blog covers wrongful convictions and police misconduct as well as the civil remedies available to the wrongfully accused.

The Basics of Wrongful Convictions

Wrongful convictions occur throughout the country each year. The unfortunate reality is that it is impossible to accurately measure just how widespread wrongful convictions have become. That said, there are a number of academic studies that have attempted to quantify the impact of wrongful convictions throughout the United States. A 2018 study suggests that at least six percent of the population of state prisons is wrongfully convicted. By their estimate, that number could be as high as 16 percent.

These wrongful convictions occur for a variety of reasons. Forced and false confessions are arguably the most common cause. In more egregious cases, police falsify evidence to secure a wrongful conviction. Prosecutorial misconduct and malicious prosecution are also significant factors.

Falsifying Evidence

One of the most shocking forms of wrongdoing is the falsification of evidence in a criminal case. According to a study by the National Registry of Exonerations, misconduct by police and prosecutors is a primary cause of wrongful convictions. Falsifying evidence is one of the most notable types of misconduct in these situations.

Falsifying evidence can happen in different ways, including:

  • Hiding Evidence. One common form of falsifying evidence involves obscuring or hiding evidence that could lead to an acquittal. This could involve hiding DNA evidence pointing to another suspect or failing to turn over the name of a witness that could exonerate the accused.
  • Destroying Physical Evidence. Falsifying evidence could also involve destroying evidence that points to innocence.
  • Fabricating Evidence. Some police have been known to fabricate evidence of guilt. This could involve concocting witness statements that incriminate the defendant. It could also involve creating or planting physical evidence that points to the accused.

This type of misconduct is particularly harmful, as it involves an intentional act by police or prosecutors to subvert justice to convict an innocent person of a crime they did not commit.

Malicious Prosecution

Malicious prosecution is the abuse of the criminal justice system by a state prosecutor targeting an innocent person. A prosecution is malicious when it is brought despite the lack of evidence of guilt for the crime in question. Essentially, malicious prosecution is a case that involves the prosecutor pursuing criminal charges with malice despite the lack of incriminating evidence.

It is worth noting that there is a high bar to prove malicious prosecution. After all, the state is not limited to filing charges only when the evidence of guilt is overwhelming. For a prosecution to be considered malicious, the underlying cause must be so weak that any reasonable prosecutor would have declined to pursue the case.

Malicious prosecution is also a civil tort that gives the wrongfully accused grounds to pursue monetary compensation against the city. It should be noted that proving a case of “malicious prosecution” does not require a conviction. This is because the mere allegation of criminal wrongdoing could be harmful to the accused. Many people spend months or years waiting in jail before they are ever tried for the charges they face. 

Forced Confessions

A confession by the accused can be the centerpiece of a criminal prosecution. Indeed, it is sometimes the only evidence that a prosecutor has when trying to incarcerate someone for decades to come. Unfortunately, false confessions happen all the time. All too often, they are coerced or forced by the actions of the police.

Since the late 1980s, studies have identified more than 250 false confessions that were forced or coerced through police interrogation. The real number of forced confessions is likely much higher.

There are other signs that false or forced confessions make up a large percentage of wrongful convictions. According to the National Registry of Exonerations, more than one out of every four people exonerated gave a false confession during the course of the police interview. The vast majority of those cases involved homicides.

There are different reasons why people confess to crimes they did not commit, but most of them boil down to aggressive tactics from the police. In some cases, this includes the use of threats or physical violence to extract a confession from a suspect. Many people eventually confess to whatever they have been accused of in an effort to escape the situation.

Wrongful Convictions in Philadelphia

Philadelphia has long been a hotbed of wrongful criminal convictions. The city currently faces multiple wrongful conviction lawsuits that could result in monetary awards totaling tens of millions of dollars.

As of June 2021, more than two dozen malicious prosecution lawsuits were pending against the City of Philadelphia from individuals exonerated of their criminal charges. As the Philadelphia Inquirer reports, the number of suits could increase dramatically in the near future.

The Conviction Integrity Unit

To combat the rash of wrongful convictions plaguing the city, District Attorney Larry Krasner has developed a Conviction Integrity Unit within the District Attorney’s office. This unit is tasked with ensuring that past criminal convictions were lawful and did not involve any form of official misconduct.

The Conviction Integrity Unit is tasked with investigating allegations of wrongful convictions when there is enough evidence that an innocent person has been incarcerated. A case will only be reviewed when a defendant makes a written request for their case to heard.

Certain guidelines must be met in order for the Conviction Integrity Unit to review a conviction. First, the conviction must have occurred within the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.

The Unit does not have jurisdiction to review cases brought by other district attorneys. Second, there must be a claim of actual innocence or wrongful conviction. Finally, the claim must not be frivolous. In other words, there must be some evidence of actual innocence or wrongful conviction.

The Wrongful Conviction of Walter Ogrod

One of the most famous wrongful convictions in Pennsylvania history involves our client Walter Ogrod. Walter Ogrod was wrongfully convicted of murdering 4-year-old Barbara Jean Horn in 1988. After a mistrial, Ogrod’s second trial resulted in a murder conviction in 1996. While he confessed to the murder initially, Ogrod claims police coerced the confession. He has maintained his innocence ever since.

In June of 2020, the Philadelphia prosecutor’s office joined with Ogrod’s defense counsel to file a motion seeking the dismissal of the charges against Ogrod. Ogrod was freed after the Court of Common Pleas overturned his conviction. With our help, Walter is now suing the City of Philadelphia in civil court. If successful, the financial compensation could be life-changing.

Compensation for a Wrongful Conviction

It is impossible to undo the damage that comes with serving time in prison following a wrongful conviction. There is no way to recover the lost time or undo the emotional and physical toll that a wrongful conviction brings.

That said, there is an avenue for monetary compensation following a wrongful conviction. Although this money will not undo what happened, it may provide the wrongfully convicted with the resources needed to get their life back on track. Some of the compensation that could be available with these claims could cover:

  • Emotional distress
  • Lost income
  • Diminished future earning capacity
  • Physical injuries
  • Medical expenses
  • Punitive damages

Hold The Police Accountable for Misconduct

There is no way to undo the harm that comes with police misconduct and wrongful convictions. For many people who fall victim to this behavior, large portions of their lives were simply wasted behind bars. The good news is that there is a remedy under the law for this kind of injustice.

Once you have established your innocence and secured your release following a wrongful conviction, your next step towards justice involves a civil lawsuit. You could pursue a civil claim to recover monetary compensation from the government that wronged you.

The Marrone Law Firm, LLC is proud to fight for the rights of the wrongly convicted. Holding police and prosecutors guilty of misconduct accountable is a role we take seriously. If you are ready to pursue action in your case, call right away for your free initial consultation.

Website: https://marronelaw.com/

Phone: 866-732-6700

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/marronelawfirm/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/josephmmarroneMedia Contact for Marrone Law Firm, LLC: Brigette Lutz, bl***@ma************.com

Airbnb Reportedly Paid Off A Sexual Assault Victim To Stay Quiet

Airbnb Reportedly Paid Off A Sexual Assault Victim To Stay Quiet

If you were assaulted while staying at an Airbnb in Philadelphia, call the Marrone Law Firm for a consultation.

Airbnbs have taken off in recent years, offering unique and cost-effective alternatives to traditional hotels. However, they are recently making headlines, not for their housing options, but for silencing an alleged rape victim who was assaulted at one of their properties. 

Alleged Sexual Assault Occurs at New York Airbnb

The alleged assault occurred back in 2016 when the woman was reportedly assaulted while renting one of Airbnb’s New York properties. The woman returned to her rental when the attacker popped out of the bathroom and held her at knifepoint. The alleged attacker, Junior Lee, was later found to be in possession of keys to the New York rental. He has been charged with predatory sexual assault, though he has pleaded not guilty due to reasons of mental defect. 

According to the Bloomberg report, Airbnb allegedly paid the victim $7 million. In exchange for the multi-million dollar payout, the victim agreed not to discuss the settlement or “imply responsibility or liability” on part of Airbnb or the host of the rental property. 

According to Ben Breit, a spokesman for Airbnb, their safety team contacted the New York Police Department after the attack and helped the victim get to a hotel. They also flew her mother in to be with her, flew them back home to Australia, and offered to cover health care costs and mental health counseling. 

An Investigation into Airbnb Yields Surprising Results

According to this Bloomberg investigation, Airbnb spends on average $50 million per year in settling claims brought by guests and property owners, although Airbnb claims that most of this money is used to compensate property owners for damage caused by guests or other parties. Airbnb does have a crisis response team that may be called upon in injury cases where the company may be exposed to liability, particularly cases involving physical or sexual assaults, like the stories mentioned above. These teams are authorized to compensate injured victims’ costs, including lodging, food, transportation, and healthcare expenses. 

If you have been hurt in an Airbnb property, what are your rights for obtaining compensation? Unfortunately, pursuing a claim for financial recovery after an Airbnb accident may not be easy.

Pursuing Compensation Against Airbnb After an Accident in a Rental

Unfortunately, in many cases, Airbnb may prove to be little help if you are injured in an accident in a property you have rented through the platform. Airbnb’s terms of service include a release of liability that ostensibly prevents you from filing an injury lawsuit against Airbnb if you are hurt while staying on someone’s property. 

Airbnb does have a $1 million liability insurance policy. However, guests who are injured while staying at an Airbnb often face significant difficulties and delay in recovering any compensation from Airbnb’s insurance. 

Examples of Accidents That Can Occur in Airbnbs

Common types of accidents or other incidents that lead to injury that frequently occur in Airbnbs include:

  • Slip and fall accidents
  • Trip and fall accidents
  • Burns
  • Electrocutions
  • Crush injuries caused by falling furniture or other objects.
  • Swimming pool accidents
  • Toxic exposure
  • Injuries from assaults caused by negligent security

Who May Be Held Liable for an Airbnb Accident

Normally, under premises liability law a property owner can be held liable for injuries caused by a dangerous or hazardous condition of the property that is caused or allowed to exist due to the property owner’s negligent maintenance of the property. 

However, pursuing compensation from a property owner that you rent an Airbnb from may prove incredibly tricky. The property owner’s homeowner’s insurance may not cover injuries that you suffer while renting the property through Airbnb, as many homeowners’ insurance policies exclude coverage for losses that occur while the insured home is being used for commercial purposes.

You may have similar difficulty obtaining compensation if you rent an Airbnb from a user who merely leases their property from a landlord. As with homeowners’ insurance, renters’ insurance may exclude coverage if the rented property is used for commercial purposes. Even if you were injured in the common areas of an apartment building or complex where you were renting an Airbnb, the landlord may try to avoid liability on grounds that their tenant’s renting out of their apartment on Airbnb violates the tenant’s lease, along with other local or state regulations that govern whether and how properties can be rented through Airbnb.

Contact a Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer to Discuss Your Airbnb Accident Case in Pennsylvania

Did you or a loved one sustain serious injuries due to an Airbnb accident in Pennsylvania? Don’t let the medical bills pile up while you wait for the negligent party or their insurance company to do the right thing. Right now, you need an aggressive personal injury attorney on your side, fighting to get you the compensation you need, want, and deserve. The skilled attorneys at Marrone Law Firm, LLC represent clients injured because of Airbnb accidents in Philadelphia, Center City, University City, and throughout Pennsylvania. Call (866) 732-6700 or fill out our online contact form to schedule a free consultation about your case. We have an office conveniently located at 200 S. Broad St., Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19102 as well as Cherry Hill, NJ.

The articles on this blog are for informative purposes only and are no substitute for legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact our law firm directly.

City of Philadelphia Facing Multiple Claims of Wrongful Conviction

The City of Philadelphia has been at the center of several high profile cases over the past couple of months involving individuals serving time for murder convictions who had their convictions vacated on appeal. Walter Ogrod Sues City of Philadelphia after Overturning His Murder Conviction Walter Ogrod, represented by the Marrone Law Firm, LLC

Philly Lawyer Joe Marrone Selected to Super Lawyers For 2021

Philly Lawyer Joe Marrone Selected to Super Lawyers For 2021

The Marrone Law Firm, LLC is proud to announce that Attorney Joseph Marrone has been selected to Super Lawyers for 2021.

Continue reading to learn more about Mr. Marrone, the Super Lawyers inclusion process, and how the team at the Marrone Law Firm, LLC can help you maximize your compensation for your personal injury or medical malpractice claim. 

About Super Lawyers

Inclusion to the Super Lawyers list is no easy feat. Since its inception, this rating service has thoroughly reviewed outstanding lawyers from over 70 different practice areas, all of whom have earned a high level of peer recognition and professional achievement. Inclusion on the Super Lawyers list can’t be bought. In fact, Super Lawyers utilizes a multi-phase selection process in which peer nominations, evaluations, and independent research are used to determine who meets these criteria. 

In fact, inclusion to the Super Lawyers list is earned by only about five percent of lawyers in all of Pennsylvania. 

You can view Mr. Marrone’s Super Lawyers page here. 

About Joe Marrone

Mr. Marrone is a Philadelphia native. After earning his B.S. from Saint Joseph’s University, he went on to pursue his Juris Doctor from the Western Michigan University Cooley Law School. Upon his graduation from law school (and admission to both the PA and NJ bar in 1991 and 1992, respectively) he worked as a political advisor to Edward Rendell, the former Governor of Pennsylvania during his mayoral campaign that began in 1992. After some time spent working on Mr. Rendell’s campaign, Joe was soon promoted to Assistant City Solicitor. 

Mr. Marrone’s roots have always been firmly planted in Philadelphia. In 1993, he founded the Marrone Law Firm, LLC where he and his team have helped countless individuals in their personal injury claims. He has taken on a number of high-profile cases that have resulted in multi-million dollar settlements for the plaintiffs. His legal prowess has earned his numerous accolades and as such, he has been selected to/as: 

  • “Best of the Bar” 2021 – Philadelphia Business Journal
  • “Best Lawyers in America” 2019 & 2021
  • “Best Lawyers” 2016 – 2021 – U.S. News & World Report – Best Lawyers® Joseph M. Marrone – Medical Malpractice – Plaintiff; Personal Injury-Plaintiff
  • “10 Best” Personal Injury Law Attorneys for Client Satisfaction in Pennsylvania – 2017. This prestigious award is an honor given by the American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys.
  • “10 Best” Personal Injury Law Attorneys for Client Satisfaction in Pennsylvania – 2016. This prestigious award is an honor given by the American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys.
  • “Awesome Attorney” 2016 – Personal Injury in South Jersey Magazine by readers’ choice.
  • “Top Attorney” 2015 in Philadelphia Life/Suburban Life Magazine.
  • “Awesome Attorney” 2014 – Personal Injury in South Jersey Magazine by readers’ choice.
  • “Top Attorney” 2014 in Philadelphia Life/Suburban Life Magazine.

While the above list is not exhaustive, it’s indicative of why Mr. Marrone has been selected to Super Lawyers. In 2017, Mr. Marrone was invited to become a member of the “Million Dollar Advocates Forum.” This elite status is only bestowed upon attorneys who have achieved multiple multi-million dollar settlements. It is a title earned by less than 1% of attorneys in the United States. 

About the Marrone Law Firm, LLC

The Marrone Law Firm, LLC is multi-faceted, handling everything from the most complex personal injury claims to civil litigation and criminal defense. When you work with us, you can find comfort in knowing that your case will be taken seriously. We understand that accidents and injuries don’t discriminate – they can happen at any place and at any time. It’s because of this that our firm is available to you by phone morning, noon and night. Whenever you are, whatever’s happening, you can be rest assured that you can get ahold of us. 

Our firm handles the following cases:

If you or someone else in your family is facing a criminal charge or were injured as a result of another person’s negligence, don’t delay. Our firm is available to you by phone 24/7. At Marrone Law, LLC, you are in trusted hands. Our team has earned numerous accolades, including Attorney Brian M. Marchese, who was recently named a Rising Star by Super Lawyers for 2021. 

Contact A Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer To Discuss Your Accident Case In Pennsylvania

Did you or a loved one sustain serious injuries in Pennsylvania? Don’t let the medical bills pile up while you wait for the negligent party or their insurance company to do the right thing. Right now, you need an aggressive personal injury attorney on your side, fighting to get you the compensation you need, want, and deserve. The skilled attorneys at Marrone Law Firm LLC represent clients in Philadelphia, Center City, University City, and throughout Pennsylvania. Call 215-709-7360 or fill out our online contact form to schedule a free consultation about your case. We have an office conveniently located at 200 South Broad Street, Suite 400, Philadelphia PA 19102 as well as offices in Cherry Hill, New Jersey.

The articles on this blog are for informative purposes only and are no substitute for legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact our law firm directly.

Citations

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site.